The Earth is missing 3 trillion tons of mass

If you were to add up the mass of all the atoms in the Earth, you’d get a number 3 trillion tons more than the Earth’s actual mass. We didn’t have to count all the atoms down to the Earth’s core to figure this out. It’s a consequence of the laws of physics.

Let’s start with a related puzzle. You might have heard that nuclear reactions work by converting mass to energy, according to Einstein’s famous equation E=mc2. Most nuclear reactors work by hitting atoms of Uranium-235 with neutrons, breaking the atoms apart and producing more neutrons in a chain reaction. But these nuclear reactions don’t destroy any protons or neutrons. So what mass are they converting into energy?

Here’s an example nuclear fission reaction you might find in a nuclear power plant.1 At the start, we have one neutron hitting an atom of Uranium-235, which has 92 protons and 143 neutrons. So in total, we have 92 protons and 144 neutrons.

After the fission, we have Caesium-137 with 55 protons and 82 neutrons, Rubidium-96 with 37 protons and 59 neutrons, and 3 extra neutrons ready to continue the chain reaction. So in total, we have 92 protons and 144 neutrons – exactly the same as before.

Now, let’s add up the mass. The standard unit of atomic mass is “daltons”, defined as one twelfth of the mass of a Carbon-12 atom, or about 1.66×10-27 kg. So how many daltons do we have before and after our reaction?

U-235

235.0439

Cs-137

136.9071

Neutron

1.0087

Rb-96

95.9341

Neutron

1.0087

Neutron

1.0087

Neutron

1.0087

Start total

236.0526

End total

235.8673

Somehow, we’ve lost 0.1853 daltons.2 How, exactly?

The secret goes back to E=mc2. The equation doesn’t just say that mass can become energy, or that energy can become mass. It’s that mass is energy, and energy is mass.

If you wanted to pull a Uranium-235 atom apart into separate protons, neutrons, and electrons, you’d need to put in a bunch of energy to overcome the strong nuclear force that’s holding the nucleus together in the first place.3  The amount of energy you’d need is called the “binding energy” of the U-235 nucleus.

Adding the binding energy to the system literally adds mass. A collection of 92 loose protons, 92 loose electrons, and 143 loose neutrons has a mass of 236.9590 daltons, which is 1.9151 daltons more than an atom of U-235. And using E=mc2, we can tell that difference equals 2.858×10-10 Joules – exactly the binding energy of U-235!

So because an assembled atom is a lower energy system than a bunch of loose particles, it also has a lower mass. And because the fission products are an even lower energy system than U-235 plus a neutron, they have an even lower mass. And again, this is literal mass – the atom has less inertia and less gravity all because it has less energy.

Speaking of gravity, the Earth has a binding energy too. Earth is held together by gravity, not the strong nuclear force, but the principle applies the same way. The gravitational binding energy of Earth is 2.49×1032 joules, which corresponds to a bit less than 3 trillion metric tons of missing mass. So the Earth has about 3 trillion tons less mass than the material that makes it up.

On the scale of the Earth, the amount of missing mass is negligible – less than one billionth the planet’s total mass. But neutron stars, which are many trillions of times denser than Earth, are missing about 15% of their total mass because their gravity is so strong.4 With such extreme objects in the universe, crazy physics is bound to happen.

1 The reaction in this image is only one of many possible ways a Uranium atom can split. See https://www-nds.iaea.org/relnsd/vcharthtml/VChartHTML.html for a full list of fission products.
2 Note that the atomic masses that I use here include electrons, not just the nucleus. This shouldn’t change the mass difference: the number of electrons is the same both before and after since there are as many electrons as protons.
3You’d also need to put in energy to tear away the electrons, but that’s negligible at this scale.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Signore Galilei

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading